| |
Eight
Different Kinds of Publishing Deals: A Thumbnail Sketch
By, Bart Day (11/02)
People often speak of “publishing deals” in a generic way, which implies
that there is only one kind of publishing deal. In fact, there are a
number of different kinds of publishing deals, as described below.
In the very early days of music publishing, songwriters simply sold their
songs to music publishers for a flat amount. Later, as songwriters became
more business savvy and gained a little more negotiating leverage, a new
kind of contract evolved, consisting of three basic elements: (1) The
songwriter would assign all copyright ownership of the songwriter’s songs
to the publisher; (2) The publisher would then commercially exploit the
songs (e.g., by the sale of sheet music); and (3) The publisher would pay
royalties to the songwriter.
Although that type of deal (which I refer to below as the “traditional
publishing deal”) still widely exists today, various newer kinds of
“publishing deals” have evolved over the years.
Incidentally, when I use the term “publishing deal” here, I’m using the
term rather broadly, to refer to any kind of deal whereby some individual
or company (other than the songwriter) obtains the right to receive a
share of the songwriter’s music publishing income (for example, mechanical
royalties from the use of songs on records, public performance income from
BMI and ASCAP for radio airplay, and synchronization income from the use
of songs in films, television shows, computer games, etc.).
In short, the eight kinds of publishing deals today are as follows:
(1) The “traditional” Publishing Agreement;
(2) Single Song Agreements;
(3) Co-Publishing Agreements;
(4) “Step Deals”;
(5) Administration Agreements;
(6) Income Participation Agreements;
(7) Catalog Representation Agreements; and
(8) Self-Publishing Agreements.
These eight kinds of deals vary from one to the other in many respects,
most importantly the following: (1) What percentage of copyright
ownership, if any, is given to the publisher; (2) What share of future
publishing income the publisher will get; (3) What functions the publisher
will perform; and (4) How long the agreement will remain in effect for.
For example, the first four kinds of deals mentioned above involve the
transfer of at least part of the copyright ownership of the songs. Not so,
usually, with the last four kinds of deals mentioned above.
Of the eight kinds of deals mentioned above, there will almost always be
one particular kind of deal that will be the most appropriate type of
agreement for a particular situation. By the same token, that same
contract will likely be totally inappropriate for many other types of
situations. For example, an Administrative Publishing deal might be the
perfect kind of deal for one situation, and totally inappropriate for a
different situation. Therefore, I will outline below, for each type of
deal, the kind of situations that each kind of deal is particularly
appropriate for.
And now, for a thumbnail sketch of each of the eight kinds of deals
mentioned above.
The Traditional Publishing Deal
First, of all, the term “Traditional Publishing Deal” is not a term
customarily used in the music industry. I am only using that term here for
purposes of distinguishing this type of deal from the other types of
publishing deals mentioned below.
1. Typical Scenario. As mentioned above, this kind of deal dates back to
the days of Tin Pan Alley. Today it’s used when a songwriter and a
publisher want to have a long-term relationship for all of the material
that the songwriter will be writing during the duration of the contract.
This type of deal is usually not used when the songwriter is signed to a
record deal. (See “Co-Publishing Deals” below.)
2. Material Covered by the Deal. This kind of deal will cover material
written during the term of the contract, and sometimes may include certain
specified songs written before the contract was entered into. Usually the
contract will require the songwriter to deliver a certain number of new
original songs to the publisher during each year of the contract.
3. Copyright Transferred. Normally, the writer is assigning (to the
publisher) 100% ownership of the copyright of the songs covered by the
contract.
4. Income Sharing. The publisher receives all income from third parties,
then pays the writer one-half of that income. The publisher here is
getting a larger share of the publishing income than in most of the other
types of deals mentioned below. That is because, in the case of this
“traditional” kind of publishing deal, the publisher’s responsibility is
to proactively promote the songs involved and, theoretically at least, it
is the publisher’s efforts that will cause any future success of the
songs. On the other hand, in the case of many of the other types of deals
involved, the publisher’s role is less promotional and proactive in
nature, hence the publisher gets a small piece of the pie.
5. Term. Normally, the agreement will be for an initial one-year period
(with the writer obligated to deliver a certain number of songs to the
publisher in that one year), then the publisher will have several (in the
range of three to six) consecutive one-year options following that initial
one year.
Incidentally – and this is very important -- the “term” means the period
of time during which the songwriter is writing songs for the publisher,
and not how long the publisher will have rights in those songs. Normally
even though the term of the agreement may be only a few years, the
publisher will be the owner of those songs for a much, much longer period
of time, i.e., until they go into public domain many years later. (There
is one exception here: If there is a reversion clause in the contract,
then copyright ownership may revert to the songwriter at some future
specified time.)
6. Advances. Established publishers usually pay a recoupable advance to
the songwriter for the first year (payable in installments), often in the
range of $25,000 to $50,000), then an additional advance each following
year the publisher exercises its option to continue the contract for
another year. Normally the contract will contain somewhat complicated
provisions for how the amounts of the advances for the follow-up years
will be calculated.
The Single Song Agreement
1. Typical Scenario. This type of agreement basically is based on the same
concept and structure as the “traditional” type of deal mentioned above,
but involves only one (or several) of the songwriter’s songs (i.e., songs
already written). Sometimes, a relationship between a songwriter and
publisher will start out this way, and later they will enter into the
“traditional” type of deal mentioned above.
2. Material Covered by the Deal. Even though the title of this kind of
deal would imply that it is only for one song, this kind of agreement is
sometimes used for several songs at the same time.
3. Copyright Transferred. Same as with the Traditional Deal mentioned
above.
4. Income Sharing. Same as with the Traditional Deal mentioned above.
5. Term. Same as the Traditional Deal mentioned above, but in the case of
the Single Song Agreement, it is much more likely that there will be a
reversion clause. Typically the contract will (or, at least, should)
provide that the copyright ownership will revert to the songwriter if the
publisher is not able to get the song recorded by a signed third party
artist or used in a film, television program, etc. within twelve or
eighteen months.
6. Advances. Typically there is only a very small advance paid, in the
range of $200 - $500 per song, and sometimes no advance is paid.
Co-Publishing Deals (aka "Co-Pub Deals")
1. Typical Scenario. This type of agreement is typically used for writers
who are in groups already signed to a record deal. This type of agreement
covers the original material on the group’s records. Normally all of the
members of the group who are songwriters will be signed to this type of
agreement with the same publisher.
Just to be clear here, I’m talking about a publishing deal with a
publishing company not affiliated with the record company. Today, it is
much less likely than it used to be that a record company will demand a
publishing deal as part of a record deal.
2. Material Covered by the Deal. All of the original songs on the group’s
first record, then the publisher will have the right to options on the
original songs on anywhere from two to four of the follow-up albums, hence
for a total of 3 to 5 albums, with the exact number depending on what the
parties negotiate.
3. Copyright Transferred. The songwriter normally transfers one-half of
the copyright ownership to the publisher and retains the other one-half
ownership. In other words, the song is co-published (and the copyright is
co-owned 50-50) by the third party publisher and the writer’s own
publishing company.
4. Income Sharing. Normally, the third party publisher will collect all
income and then pay to the songwriter and the songwriter’s publishing
company 75% of all publishing income.
5. Term. As already mentioned, co-publishing agreements are usually for a
certain specified number of albums.
6. Advances. Advances are almost always paid to the songwriter in the case
of co-publishing deals. For groups newly signed to major label record
deals, the initial advance from a major music publisher is typically in
the $150,000 - $500,000 range and sometimes higher, with additional
advances being paid if and when the publisher exercises its options for
the follow-up albums.
"Step Deals"
This type of deal is for situations where the songwriter is not yet signed
to a record deal, but may later enter into a record deal. The contract
here will provide, in effect, that the deal will be the “Traditional” deal
mentioned above, but will automatically transform into a Co-Publishing
deal if and when the songwriter is signed to a record deal.
Administration Deals (aka "Admin Deals")
1. Typical Scenario. This type of deal is used when the songwriter just
wants a publisher to collect royalties and handle the various paperwork
(for example, the BMI/ASCAP song title registrations, copyright
applications, the issuance of licenses, etc.), and where the songwriter
does not want or need a publisher to proactively promote his or her
catalog of song. A good example of a company that does a lot of
Administration Deals is Bug Music in Los Angeles.
2. Material Covered by the Deal. Most often this kind of deal covers all
material written by the songwriter, or at least any material that the
songwriter has not already committed to other publishers.
3. Copyright Transferred. No transfer of copyright.
4. Income Sharing. Typically, the publisher will take 10% to 20% of the
income, and the pay the rest to the songwriter and the songwriter’s
publishing company.
5. Term. Administration deals are normally in the range of three to five
years.
6. Advances. For catalogs generating a modest amount of income, usually no
advance is paid. For more profitable catalogs, usually an advance will be
paid, with the amount to be determined on the basis of the income that has
been generated in recent years by the catalog.
Income Participation Deals
1. Typical Scenario. This type of deal is a “publishing deal” only in the
sense that it involves a share of future publishing income. Usually this
type of deal is used to cut someone in on a share of the publishing income
– for example, to serve in effect as a “finder’s fee” for having found a
record deal for a songwriter. Very often the “income participant” is not
even a publisher.
2. Material Covered by the Deal. Highly negotiable and varies widely. May
only cover, for example, the material on the songwriter’s first album.
3. Copyright Transferred. No share of copyright is transferred. Instead
the “income participant” is only entitled to receive a share of income.
4. Income Sharing. Varies widely, but often is in the range of 10% to 15%.
5. Term. Again, highly negotiable and varies widely.
6. Advances. No advance is involved.
Catalog Representation Deals
1. Typical Scenario. This type of deal is used when a songwriter or
publisher is primarily interested in getting their material used in films,
television programs, etc. and want to enter into a deal with a company
that specializes in doing so and has all the necessary connections. Ocean
Park Music and Media Creature Music are good examples of Catalog
Representation companies.
Usually those types of companies also represent record labels that want to
get their masters used in films, etc.
2. Material Covered by the Deal. Typically, as the title “Catalog
Representation” would imply, the songwriter or publisher’s entire catalog.
But sometimes the Catalog Representation company will “cherry-pick” only
certain songs for representation.
3. Copyright Transferred. No copyright is transferred.
4. Income Sharing. Typically in the range of 25% - 50% of the income from
any deals secured by the Catalog Representation company.
5. Term. Often in the range of two to three years, but sometimes longer,
sometimes shorter.
6. Advances. Usually no advance is paid, but there are occasional
exceptions.
Self-Publishing Deals
1. Typical Scenario. This type of deal is between a U.S. publisher
(including songwriters who act as their own publisher), on the one hand,
and a foreign publisher, on the other hand. For a cut of the income in the
applicable foreign territories, the foreign publisher will collect the
income in those territories.
U.S publishers enter into this kind of deal in order to receive their
money faster from foreign territories and also to collect more of the
income that has been earned in those foreign territories. (Often, for
various reasons, only part of the income earned in foreign territories is
actually collected. The money not collected is customarily referred to as
“black box money.”)
2. Material Covered by the Deal. Usually the entire catalog.
3. Copyright Transferred. No copyright is transferred.
4. Income Sharing. The foreign sub-publisher will normally take in the
range of 25% of the income off the top, then pay the balance to the U.S.
publisher. The percentage taken by the sub-publisher will be significantly
less for large, profitable catalogs.
5. Term. Usually in the range of three to five years.
6. Advances. Same situation as with Administration Deals.
-----
Bart Day is a Portland-based entertainment attorney in private practice
and is also music counsel for Vivendi Universal Games, the computer game
division of Universal Studios.
Bart is also the co-author of a chapter (entitled “Contracts and
Relationships between Major Labels and Independent Labels”) in The
Musician’s Business and Legal Guide, a book compiled by the Beverly Hills
Bar Association and published by Prentice-Hall Publishing (New York).
The reader is cautioned to seek the advice of the reader's own attorney
concerning the applicability of the general principles discussed in this
column to the reader's own activities.
|
|